The study aims to analyze the different approaches to ELT in the new normal for both private and public Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) as the basis for teaching pedagogy in terms of the trend in teaching, syllabus utilization, materials, and resources, activities in learning, and competency learning. The study comprised thirty-nine (39) respondents only which employs the descriptive quantitative research design and random sampling. Results show that trend in teaching context based and content instruction on the English language as the medium of teaching and instruction in English Language Teaching (ELT) focuses on the language cooperative approach in teaching approaches that suits to the learning capacity of students. It emphasizes on the complex and competency based learning and outcome of the process of learning as to skills, application, knowledge, and attitude of the learners, materials and resources, show that different centered on the instruction of the English language approach to learning, the activity is focused on the task based-learning and the process of usage in the important skills of the ELT, and competency process of learning show to provide students in the competency of ELT and language learning inside the classroom and direction in the specific task in the English competency of learning. Findings show that there is a significant correlation between the different approaches to ELT in the new normal for both private and public Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) as the basis for teaching pedagogy among the respondents.

This study aimed to look into the impact of continuous self-assessment on the self-efficacy beliefs of undergraduates studying English as a foreign language (EFL). To find out if there is a change in students’ beliefs about their language proficiency perception, the research was undertaken with 102 participants at the school of foreign languages of a private university. It was designed as quasi-experimental research utilizing qualitative and quantitative research methods to collect data through a self-efficacy scale, self-assessment questionnaire, and self-reflection checklists. The control and experimental groups were administered a self-efficacy scale at the beginning and the end of the term. Throughout the term, the participants in the experimental group assessed themselves weekly through self-reflection checklists and a self-assessment questionnaire. Based on the overall results, it was found that when the students had an opportunity to identify their strengths and weaknesses during a skill-based task through self-assessment questionnaires, they had a better sense of mastery related to that task. This inevitably led to an increase in their self-efficacy beliefs in terms of four skills, namely reading, writing, listening, and speaking as well as grammar.

Self-esteem can be simply defined as how a person views and appreciates him or herself as an individual. This is closely related to the idea of self-concept, which is an individual’s perception of who they are emotionally, physically, spiritually, and socially, as well as with regard to various other facets. Self-esteem is an important aspect of a language learner. It deals with how a learner views him or herself, whether a learner views him or herself as a successful or failing language learner. This study revealed how Procedural Writing class students in a private university perceived themselves. The study was conducted in an English Education Study Program of a private university in Central Java, Indonesia. It questioned whether these students had high or low self-esteem. The research only focused on one question: Do Procedural Writing class students with high self-esteem have good language learning achievement? The data was mainly collected from 14 students; 13 were Indonesian, and one was Korean. The findings revealed that students with good achievements do not always have high self-esteem. Many factors affected their self-esteem. Their characters, learning environment, and past experiences were a few of the other factors. In contrast, students considered as low achievers could have high self-confidence and self-esteem.

The course design has been paid attention to by both teachers and administrators. However, for a long time, some problems, such as the fragmented course design, and the repeated teaching contents, have existed in the college English curriculum for non- English majors from undergraduates, graduates and Ph. D students in the mainland China. Based on the ESP “learning-centred” approach, this study intends to construct an integrated curriculum system to help solve these problems through three main features of the integrated curriculum system: systematicness, hierarchy and openness. To investigate the feasibility of the course system, the combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods were used through questionnaire, text analysis and interview. The results show that, 1. This curriculum system can avoid the repetition of the course content. The fragmented curriculum design and the needs from the nation, society and students can be met through the systematicness, hierarchy and openness. 2. This system can facilitate teachers’ teaching reform and research interest because they have more choices to adapt the materials from students’ disciplines besides textbooks. This curriculum system is hoped to provide a possible way to meet the nation, society and students’ needs in the Chinese tertiary context.

This study focused on investigating English as a foreign language (EFL) gifted high school students’ challenges in classes when the integration of reading and writing was used. 103 grade 11 students from three gifted high schools in Mekong Delta were invited to participate in this study. The study adopted a descriptive, mixed method research design which employed the questionnaire and semi-structured interviews to collect data. The questionnaire, together with semi-structured interviews was used to collect data about EFL gifted high school students’ challenges of integration of reading and writing on their writing skills. The results of the study proved that students faced difficulties in integrating reading into writing lessons at a medium level, in relation to materials and integration tasks. However, the participants faced the greatest challenge in terms of personal backgrounds.

The objective of this study with first- and second-year undergraduate Thai English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students (N = 813) was to explore the relationships among English writing performance, writing self-efficacy, and writing anxiety. The students wrote an opinion-essay by hand and completed writing self-efficacy and anxiety questionnaires. Their texts were evaluated by EFL instructors using an analytic rubric. Pearson correlations indicated that there was a positive correlation between writing performance and self-efficacy and a negative correlation between writing performance and anxiety. There was also a negative correlation between self-efficacy and anxiety. Implications are recommended for further pedagogic research that take learners’ variables into an account when examining writing performance.

Implementing an English curriculum, especially one from outside Indonesia, is risky. Some schools produce positive outcomes, while others produce the opposite. This study aims to evaluate the difficulties of learning English from writing abilities using the Cambridge Curriculum in Indonesia. This study employed a qualitative approach that included interviews with students, school administrators, English instructors, and curriculum coordinators (n = 7) and documentation and observation, which served as data validation instruments. The results of the study indicate that, of the four language skills: reading, writing, speaking, and listening, the scores for reading and writing skills were not as predicted. The maximum score for Cambridge English was 6, and of the two skills measured, notably writing, the score was 3. This conclusion highlights the need to prepare English teacher credentials per Cambridge standards. This research has consequences for the design of learning English, which can help students improve their writing skills to meet Cambridge's maximum grade criteria.

This study deals with the English language teachers’ perceived beliefs on how to improve English language students’ learning skills. English language teachers’ level of competencies on how to improve language skills of their students is the main focus of this study. Therefore, the domain, “Improving Language Skills,” defined by the Ministry of National Education (MoNE) in Türkiye in the field of “Subject Specific Competencies for Teaching Profession” has been used. This specific domain includes seven competency performances and 63 related performance indicators at three levels: A1, A2, and A3. This study, first, aims to develop a new “English Language Teacher Competency Scale” under the light of MoNE descriptors; second, it aims to observe the English teachers’ competency levels following the suggested performance indicators. The participants of the study were 100 English language teachers, teaching at public and private primary schools in Türkiye. Accordingly, the teachers responded to the mentioned scale, including other variables; such as gender, professional experience, educational background, and the type of schools they worked in. The findings indicated that there was no significant difference between the teachers’ competency beliefs about their professional experience, gender, and educational background; however, there was a significant difference in terms of the type of schools the teachers worked in. Also, this study revealed feasibility of developing the “English Language Teacher Competency Scale,”, and made the scale available to use for evaluating English Language Teaching teachers’ competency levels on how to “Improve Language Skills” in class.

This study used a qualitative method to explore a teacher’s use of motivational strategies in an English for specific purposes (ESP) course and students’ perceptions. An English teacher in a business English class and her 32 students were recruited. The class was observed three times: at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end of the course. Two semi-structured interviews with the teacher were conducted: one before classroom observation, and the other after observation. Interviews with the students were conducted after each classroom observation. The teacher used seven motivational strategies to create a supportive and relaxed classroom atmosphere, and five strategies to facilitate students’ language learning. Most students’ perceptions of the teacher’s use of motivational strategies were positive. However, the students perceived a gap between their expectations for the course and their experiences. Finally, the article concludes by offering insights into the implications and constraints related to pedagogy.

Mindset theories have been applied to study motivation in various domains, with researchers talking about different mindsets in diverse academic domains. The domain specificity of mindsets has led second language researchers to suggest distinct mindsets concerning language ability and learning outcomes. While there is no lack of research on the application of mindset theories, a systematic synthesis of the literature on mindset theories focusing on the language education domain has remained relatively unexplored. The literature in this study was identified by conducting keyword searches in Scopus and EBSCOhost research databases using a combination of the following terms: “mindset theories”, “English as a foreign language”, “English as a second language”, and “teacher training”. The search results were limited to research articles published in English-medium refereed journals from 2013 to 2023. We scrutinized the titles and abstracts of 128 articles in the initial round of screening and did a second round of close reading for relevance to the synthesis focus. This chapter synthesizes 40 research papers on the application of mindset theories in the domain of language teaching and learning, including 1) studies on language skills such as writing, 2) studies related to language teachers’ role and teacher training, and 3) theoretical and practical applications of mindset theories. The conclusions drawn will be used to recommend future directions in research and practice. The chapter will contribute to the field of mindset theories in language education in terms of research and practice for educators and researchers.

In the realm of language skills, speaking holds a pivotal position, making it imperative for classroom instruction to place a strong emphasis on its development. Teaching English speaking skills to Nepali EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students poses a unique set of challenges owing to English's non-native status in Nepal. To tackle these challenges and enhance the speaking abilities of Nepali students, English teachers in Nepal must adopt innovative strategies due to the limited daily use of English in their environment. This classroom action research endeavors to enhance the English speaking proficiency of EFL students in Nepal through the implementation of various communicative activities. These activities include role play, impromptu speaking exercises, language games such as "who is telling the truth", video tapping, and discussions. The interventions were applied to a group of 60 undergraduate students at a university who were learning English as a foreign language. The data gathered from participant classroom observations and unstructured interviews underwent thematic analysis, resulting in the identification of six distinct themes. The results demonstrated a noteworthy improvement in students' English speaking skills, attributing this progress to the implementation of communicative activities. The findings underscore the effectiveness of communicative activities as interventions for enhancing the English speaking abilities of university-level EFL undergraduates. In light of these results, it is recommended that both students and teachers remain cognizant of the contextual and appropriate use of communicative activities as a means to further improve English speaking skills among EFL students.

This two-year action research study examines how incorporating ‘The Writing Revolution’ (TWR) strategies and adapting task complexity can improve TESOL students' expository writing in secondary education in Cyprus. A total of eighty-three students (12-17 years old) from various first language (L1) backgrounds and CEFR levels (A1-B2) participated from six lower secondary (LS) and upper secondary (US) state classrooms. The methodology involved spending one-quarter of students' weekly class time on the learning and application of TWR techniques in their L2/EFL writing. Overall, 90-180 activities were completed successfully, and cognitively undemanding and context-embedded writing tasks gave way to more complex and cognitively demanding tasks to suit students’ differing proficiency levels. Qualitative analysis of students’ writing and focus group discussions indicated that writing improved coherence, organization, and complexity. Students expressed feelings of reduced anxiety and improved confidence in English writing. These findings highlight the importance of dedicating time to teaching writing explicitly in L2/FL classrooms and gradually increasing task complexity beginning at the sentence level. This study’s unique contribution demonstrates how TWR strategies can be effectively tailored to L2/FL contexts and offer practical implications for TESOL curriculum developers, researchers, and educators seeking to improve students’ writing confidence in FL and lessen writing anxiety in the classroom.

A large body of evidence demonstrates that cooperative learning promotes reading achievement.  Cooperative learning is based on Social Interdependence Theory, which holds that learners benefit from leveraging cooperative effort to achieve individual and mutual goals. Student-generated questioning (SGQ) is a cooperative learning strategy that promotes learning through an iterative self and peer-assessment process. SGQ has yielded mixed results among lower-proficiency language users, where linguistic and cultural barriers can impede efficacy. Providing students with pre-training, procedural prompts, and language modeling has proven effective. A quasi-experimental, pretest-posttest design was employed to determine the impact of a highly scaffolded SGQ strategy on reading comprehension in two intact CEFR-A2 reading classes (n = 62) over a 16-week semester at a Japanese university. The Cambridge A2 Key Test was administered before and after the reading intervention. Parametric test results revealed SGQ had no significant effect on any of the five reading subskills. Further discussion of findings and recommendations may prove instructive for reading educators and researchers of low-proficiency English students in Japan and other East Asian contexts.

This study explores the role of reconstructing reflection in fostering critical thinking and enhancing English language skills among English as a foreign language (EFL) pre-service teacher in Indonesia. It investigates students' self-perceptions, strategies for language development, and real-world applications of English learning. A descriptive qualitative approach, supported by quantitative data, involved 55 pre-service elementary school teachers from a private Indonesian university. Data were collected through weekly open-closed questionnaires via Google Forms over one semester, encouraging reflections on learning processes, challenges, and improvement strategies. Quantitative findings revealed that 87.3% of students felt confident applying English writing and speaking skills. A Pearson correlation (r = .52, p < .05) showed a moderate relationship between self-confidence and post-test scores, highlighting the value of aligning perceived and actual proficiency. However, 23.5% of “Capable” students scored below the mean of 77.13, indicating a need for targeted feedback and formative assessments. Reflective practices played a key role in developing critical thinking, helping students address challenges, refine strategies, and relate learning to real-life situations. Themes such as technology use, collaborative learning, and media exposure emerged as effective tools. Despite positive outcomes, students faced limited confidence and restricted opportunities for practice. This study emphasizes reconstructing reflection as a structured, transformative process for improving learning outcomes. Aligned with the 4R reflection model, it addresses gaps in current practices—often marked by superficial reflection—and offers actionable strategies for promoting critical thinking in EFL settings. The findings support integrating reflection, feedback, and immersive learning to enhance teaching and education.

Feedback is a crucial element in writing instruction; however, its effectiveness is still debated among scholars. This study investigates the effectiveness of teacher and peer feedback in improving spelling and punctuation skills using a quantitative experimental design that involved two pre-intermediate writing classes at the International Maritime College Oman. Twenty-six participants were randomly selected from both classes. Students' spelling and punctuation errors were assessed using a pre-test–post-test design and data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS. Results indicated that teacher feedback significantly improved both spelling and punctuation, whereas peer feedback improved punctuation but led to a decline in spelling. Overall, teacher feedback outperformed peer feedback in enhancing writing accuracy. Due to the small sample size and focus on academic essays, findings may not be generalizable. Future research should explore additional writing genres and include larger, more diverse participant groups.

Integrating critical thinking (CT) into English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction has become a pedagogical imperative in higher education, particularly in contexts striving to foster 21st-century competencies. While existing research has largely focused on intervention programs and theoretical models, there is a limited qualitative understanding of how EFL instructors embed CT within the actual teaching of language skills. This study investigates the pedagogical approaches employed by Indonesian university instructors to promote CT in reading, writing, listening, and speaking courses. Guided by the research question: What pedagogical approaches do Indonesian university EFL teachers use to promote CT in the teaching of the four language skills?, the study employed a qualitative research design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with eight EFL instructors (two per skill) from three private universities in Jakarta. Thematic analysis revealed four core themes: conceptualizing CT, skill-specific instructional strategies, challenges in implementation, and perceived student development. Findings indicate that while instructors share a strong commitment to CT, its integration is shaped by skill type, student proficiency, and institutional constraints. The study contributes novel qualitative insight into classroom-based CT pedagogy and offers practical implications for teacher education and curriculum design. Limitations include a small, urban-focused sample. Future research should consider broader, comparative contexts and incorporate student perspectives to deepen understanding and applicability.

Duolingo has become one of the most widely used gamification apps for learning English, mostly for vocabulary and grammar. However, there is limited research on its effectiveness in enhancing writing skills. This study aimed to investigate the effect of Duolingo on junior high school students' learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing skills, focusing on the overall score and five components: content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics. The study used a quasi-experimental design, specifically the non-equivalent control group, involving 41 eighth-grade students in experimental and control groups. Both groups were assigned writing tests as a pre-test and a post-test. The experimental group received an intervention using Duolingo outside the classroom for eight weeks as a supplementary tool, while the control group only received regular English classes. The statistical analysis using the independent t-test and ANCOVA revealed a significant improvement in writing skills in the experimental group (p < .05). It also showed an improvement in all writing components, especially content and organization. The partial eta squared value indicated a large effect of Duolingo (η²p = .878). These findings suggest that Duolingo has the potential to serve as a supplementary tool for improving writing skills in language learning.

This research explores the dependency on and patterns of artificial intelligence (AI) usage in English language learning among public university students in Bangladesh. The study aims to investigate the reasons behind students' reliance on AI tools, the types of information they seek, and the extent of their dependence. A mixed-method approach, combining both quantitative surveys and qualitative in-depth interviews, was employed to gather data from 120 students. The findings reveal that AI tools, particularly Grammarly and Duolingo, are widely used to improve academic writing, grammar, and vocabulary. Students perceive these tools as highly effective for language learning, as they provide instant feedback and make learning more accessible. However, the study also highlights significant concerns regarding the limitations of AI tools, such as their inability to grasp contextual understanding, cultural nuances, and the risk of over-reliance, which may hinder the development of critical thinking and metacognitive skills. Despite these concerns, students recognize the utility of AI tools as a complementary resource rather than a replacement for traditional learning methods. The research suggests that AI tools should be integrated into language learning in a balanced manner, with attention to equity in access and the development of students' higher-order thinking skills. It also emphasizes the need for policy interventions to address the digital divide and ensure that all students, particularly in resource-limited environments, have equitable access to these transformative tools.

English writing, particularly essay writing, is one of the most challenging skills for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Producing cohesive and coherent texts has become increasingly important. This study focuses on the role of synonymy as a lexical cohesive device in the essay writing of EFL students, specifically examining how frequently Albanian university students use synonyms in their essays. Additionally, the study explores how synonymy contributes to creating a well-structured and cohesive essay. Fifty-six first-year students (male and female) from the Faculty of Foreign Languages, English Department, were purposefully selected to write 56 descriptive essays. A qualitative research design was employed, with writing tasks serving as the primary data collection instrument. The data was analysed using qualitative content analysis procedures. The findings showed that synonyms were used more frequently than near-synonyms in the students' essays. It was also found that the students used various synonyms and near-synonyms to achieve logical cohesion in their writing, despite having limited knowledge of synonymy as a lexical cohesive device. Furthermore, the students had difficulty selecting the appropriate synonyms due to their insufficient vocabulary.