The objective of this study with first- and second-year undergraduate Thai English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students (N = 813) was to explore the relationships among English writing performance, writing self-efficacy, and writing anxiety. The students wrote an opinion-essay by hand and completed writing self-efficacy and anxiety questionnaires. Their texts were evaluated by EFL instructors using an analytic rubric. Pearson correlations indicated that there was a positive correlation between writing performance and self-efficacy and a negative correlation between writing performance and anxiety. There was also a negative correlation between self-efficacy and anxiety. Implications are recommended for further pedagogic research that take learners’ variables into an account when examining writing performance.

Implementing an English curriculum, especially one from outside Indonesia, is risky. Some schools produce positive outcomes, while others produce the opposite. This study aims to evaluate the difficulties of learning English from writing abilities using the Cambridge Curriculum in Indonesia. This study employed a qualitative approach that included interviews with students, school administrators, English instructors, and curriculum coordinators (n = 7) and documentation and observation, which served as data validation instruments. The results of the study indicate that, of the four language skills: reading, writing, speaking, and listening, the scores for reading and writing skills were not as predicted. The maximum score for Cambridge English was 6, and of the two skills measured, notably writing, the score was 3. This conclusion highlights the need to prepare English teacher credentials per Cambridge standards. This research has consequences for the design of learning English, which can help students improve their writing skills to meet Cambridge's maximum grade criteria.

This two-year action research study examines how incorporating ‘The Writing Revolution’ (TWR) strategies and adapting task complexity can improve TESOL students' expository writing in secondary education in Cyprus. A total of eighty-three students (12-17 years old) from various first language (L1) backgrounds and CEFR levels (A1-B2) participated from six lower secondary (LS) and upper secondary (US) state classrooms. The methodology involved spending one-quarter of students' weekly class time on the learning and application of TWR techniques in their L2/EFL writing. Overall, 90-180 activities were completed successfully, and cognitively undemanding and context-embedded writing tasks gave way to more complex and cognitively demanding tasks to suit students’ differing proficiency levels. Qualitative analysis of students’ writing and focus group discussions indicated that writing improved coherence, organization, and complexity. Students expressed feelings of reduced anxiety and improved confidence in English writing. These findings highlight the importance of dedicating time to teaching writing explicitly in L2/FL classrooms and gradually increasing task complexity beginning at the sentence level. This study’s unique contribution demonstrates how TWR strategies can be effectively tailored to L2/FL contexts and offer practical implications for TESOL curriculum developers, researchers, and educators seeking to improve students’ writing confidence in FL and lessen writing anxiety in the classroom.

Feedback is a crucial element in writing instruction; however, its effectiveness is still debated among scholars. This study investigates the effectiveness of teacher and peer feedback in improving spelling and punctuation skills using a quantitative experimental design that involved two pre-intermediate writing classes at the International Maritime College Oman. Twenty-six participants were randomly selected from both classes. Students' spelling and punctuation errors were assessed using a pre-test–post-test design and data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS. Results indicated that teacher feedback significantly improved both spelling and punctuation, whereas peer feedback improved punctuation but led to a decline in spelling. Overall, teacher feedback outperformed peer feedback in enhancing writing accuracy. Due to the small sample size and focus on academic essays, findings may not be generalizable. Future research should explore additional writing genres and include larger, more diverse participant groups.

Duolingo has become one of the most widely used gamification apps for learning English, mostly for vocabulary and grammar. However, there is limited research on its effectiveness in enhancing writing skills. This study aimed to investigate the effect of Duolingo on junior high school students' learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing skills, focusing on the overall score and five components: content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics. The study used a quasi-experimental design, specifically the non-equivalent control group, involving 41 eighth-grade students in experimental and control groups. Both groups were assigned writing tests as a pre-test and a post-test. The experimental group received an intervention using Duolingo outside the classroom for eight weeks as a supplementary tool, while the control group only received regular English classes. The statistical analysis using the independent t-test and ANCOVA revealed a significant improvement in writing skills in the experimental group (p < .05). It also showed an improvement in all writing components, especially content and organization. The partial eta squared value indicated a large effect of Duolingo (η²p = .878). These findings suggest that Duolingo has the potential to serve as a supplementary tool for improving writing skills in language learning.

English writing, particularly essay writing, is one of the most challenging skills for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Producing cohesive and coherent texts has become increasingly important. This study focuses on the role of synonymy as a lexical cohesive device in the essay writing of EFL students, specifically examining how frequently Albanian university students use synonyms in their essays. Additionally, the study explores how synonymy contributes to creating a well-structured and cohesive essay. Fifty-six first-year students (male and female) from the Faculty of Foreign Languages, English Department, were purposefully selected to write 56 descriptive essays. A qualitative research design was employed, with writing tasks serving as the primary data collection instrument. The data was analysed using qualitative content analysis procedures. The findings showed that synonyms were used more frequently than near-synonyms in the students' essays. It was also found that the students used various synonyms and near-synonyms to achieve logical cohesion in their writing, despite having limited knowledge of synonymy as a lexical cohesive device. Furthermore, the students had difficulty selecting the appropriate synonyms due to their insufficient vocabulary.