Boredom is a commonly experienced unpleasant emotion in foreign language classrooms and may negatively influence students’ learning status and outcomes. Unfortunately, limited attention has been directed to classroom boredom among students while learning foreign languages. To address this gap, this study adopted a mixed-methods approach to investigate English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom boredom experienced by students. We invited 675 Chinese senior high school EFL students to participate in the questionnaire survey about their classroom boredom, and 4 of them voluntarily participated in semi-structured interviews. The results of quantitative data analyses indicate that Chinese senior high school EFL students experienced medium levels of classroom boredom, with male students feeling significantly more bored than females and no difference in boredom in terms of grade and class type. Qualitative data also reveal students’ preferences for challenging language learning activities and learner-centered pedagogy. Our findings shed light on ways of improving EFL learners’ classroom learning experiences and emotional status.

Mindset theories have been applied to study motivation in various domains, with researchers talking about different mindsets in diverse academic domains. The domain specificity of mindsets has led second language researchers to suggest distinct mindsets concerning language ability and learning outcomes. While there is no lack of research on the application of mindset theories, a systematic synthesis of the literature on mindset theories focusing on the language education domain has remained relatively unexplored. The literature in this study was identified by conducting keyword searches in Scopus and EBSCOhost research databases using a combination of the following terms: “mindset theories”, “English as a foreign language”, “English as a second language”, and “teacher training”. The search results were limited to research articles published in English-medium refereed journals from 2013 to 2023. We scrutinized the titles and abstracts of 128 articles in the initial round of screening and did a second round of close reading for relevance to the synthesis focus. This chapter synthesizes 40 research papers on the application of mindset theories in the domain of language teaching and learning, including 1) studies on language skills such as writing, 2) studies related to language teachers’ role and teacher training, and 3) theoretical and practical applications of mindset theories. The conclusions drawn will be used to recommend future directions in research and practice. The chapter will contribute to the field of mindset theories in language education in terms of research and practice for educators and researchers.

In the realm of language skills, speaking holds a pivotal position, making it imperative for classroom instruction to place a strong emphasis on its development. Teaching English speaking skills to Nepali EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students poses a unique set of challenges owing to English's non-native status in Nepal. To tackle these challenges and enhance the speaking abilities of Nepali students, English teachers in Nepal must adopt innovative strategies due to the limited daily use of English in their environment. This classroom action research endeavors to enhance the English speaking proficiency of EFL students in Nepal through the implementation of various communicative activities. These activities include role play, impromptu speaking exercises, language games such as "who is telling the truth", video tapping, and discussions. The interventions were applied to a group of 60 undergraduate students at a university who were learning English as a foreign language. The data gathered from participant classroom observations and unstructured interviews underwent thematic analysis, resulting in the identification of six distinct themes. The results demonstrated a noteworthy improvement in students' English speaking skills, attributing this progress to the implementation of communicative activities. The findings underscore the effectiveness of communicative activities as interventions for enhancing the English speaking abilities of university-level EFL undergraduates. In light of these results, it is recommended that both students and teachers remain cognizant of the contextual and appropriate use of communicative activities as a means to further improve English speaking skills among EFL students.

This two-year action research study examines how incorporating ‘The Writing Revolution’ (TWR) strategies and adapting task complexity can improve TESOL students' expository writing in secondary education in Cyprus. A total of eighty-three students (12-17 years old) from various first language (L1) backgrounds and CEFR levels (A1-B2) participated from six lower secondary (LS) and upper secondary (US) state classrooms. The methodology involved spending one-quarter of students' weekly class time on the learning and application of TWR techniques in their L2/EFL writing. Overall, 90-180 activities were completed successfully, and cognitively undemanding and context-embedded writing tasks gave way to more complex and cognitively demanding tasks to suit students’ differing proficiency levels. Qualitative analysis of students’ writing and focus group discussions indicated that writing improved coherence, organization, and complexity. Students expressed feelings of reduced anxiety and improved confidence in English writing. These findings highlight the importance of dedicating time to teaching writing explicitly in L2/FL classrooms and gradually increasing task complexity beginning at the sentence level. This study’s unique contribution demonstrates how TWR strategies can be effectively tailored to L2/FL contexts and offer practical implications for TESOL curriculum developers, researchers, and educators seeking to improve students’ writing confidence in FL and lessen writing anxiety in the classroom.

A large body of evidence demonstrates that cooperative learning promotes reading achievement.  Cooperative learning is based on Social Interdependence Theory, which holds that learners benefit from leveraging cooperative effort to achieve individual and mutual goals. Student-generated questioning (SGQ) is a cooperative learning strategy that promotes learning through an iterative self and peer-assessment process. SGQ has yielded mixed results among lower-proficiency language users, where linguistic and cultural barriers can impede efficacy. Providing students with pre-training, procedural prompts, and language modeling has proven effective. A quasi-experimental, pretest-posttest design was employed to determine the impact of a highly scaffolded SGQ strategy on reading comprehension in two intact CEFR-A2 reading classes (n = 62) over a 16-week semester at a Japanese university. The Cambridge A2 Key Test was administered before and after the reading intervention. Parametric test results revealed SGQ had no significant effect on any of the five reading subskills. Further discussion of findings and recommendations may prove instructive for reading educators and researchers of low-proficiency English students in Japan and other East Asian contexts.

This study aims to assess the Social-Emotional Learning Instructional Competence (SELIC) of English as a foreign language pre-service teachers (EFLPTs) at a pedagogical university in Vietnam (VPU). It employed a mixed-methods design, which combines qualitative classroom observations with quantitative questionnaire responses from 351 EFLPTs to evaluate EFLPTs’ proficiency in SELIC – the competence to implement Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) in teaching practices. The results reveal both strengths and deficiencies in EFLPTs’ demonstration of SELIC. They demonstrated a strong ability to apply psychological and pedagogical principles as well as to organize activities that promote students’ social-emotional skills; however, they encountered difficulties in explicitly addressing social-emotional issues that may arise in EFL classrooms, with some EFLPTs neglecting or failing to respond to students’ social and emotional needs. Additionally, there were notable inconsistencies in EFLPTs’ modeling of social-emotional competences during their teaching practices, as some EFLPTs effectively demonstrated empathy, relationship skills and emotional management, while others faced challenges. The least developed component of SELIC was their ability to evaluate students’ social-emotional skills. These findings highlight the necessity to enhance comprehensive and explicit integration of SELIC in teacher education programs, ensuring that EFLPTs are sufficiently prepared to foster both academic achievement and social-emotional growth in their future classrooms.

Early childhood is a critical period for growth and language development, including the ability to communicate effectively. In modern educational institutions, alongside Indonesian as the mother tongue, English is often introduced as a foreign language. Teaching English to young children is approached through engaging and educational activities designed to enhance their language skills. This study employs Participatory Action Research (PAR) involving 41 kindergarten students as participants. Effective methods include singing, reading bilingual storybooks, giving instructions in English, and role-playing. Singing helps children recognize English sounds and rhythms naturally, while bilingual storybooks enrich vocabulary by linking English words to familiar contexts. Role-playing, particularly bilingual mini-theater, stands out as a prominent method. In this activity, children interact using a mix of Indonesian and English dialogues, fostering both language skills and enjoyment. By participating in such dialogues, they deepen their understanding of English words in context. Additionally, instructions given in English during role-play help children familiarize themselves with hearing and responding to the language, promoting internalization. The findings highlight that the bilingual mini-theater approach fosters a dynamic learning environment that promotes vocabulary acquisition, expressive communication, and practical language application. These creative activities make learning interactive and enjoyable, effectively supporting early childhood English language development.

The study aims at a deeper understanding of English classroom environment (CE) and foreign language enjoyment (FLE) in the context of a Chinese university and further explores the relationship among CE, FLE, and students’ performance in learning English as a foreign language. The 336 participants in this study were mostly from science departments, and about one-third of them came from Tibet and Xinjiang Autonomous Region. The findings indicate that the participants’ CE and FLE were at a moderate level and that significant positive correlations were detected among CE, FLE and English performance. The study has some practical implications for EFL (English as a foreign language) teaching and learning: (a) The establishment of a good healthy CE can effectively promote students’ performance; (b) The students’ FLE can help them learn English better; (c) Teachers and students should attach importance to the process of English learning, where teachers ought to actively play their part in building a healthy CE and enhancing students’ sense of FLE in English learning.

The lack of pragmatic knowledge of email structure and little awareness of politeness strategies in email conventions that affects one’s presentation of self through language use usually make students perceived negatively when they communicate with their teachers. In this mixed methods study, 96 Grade 7 male students from convenience sampling produced 327 emails after receiving a brief module about pragmatic implications and formal structure in emails and the teacher’s instruction and demonstration in email conventions. The Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Project (CCSARP) and Politeness and Face Theories were applied to examine the structure, language features, and politeness strategies of these emails and to explore how the students’ pragmatic competence and identities were reflected through their communicative language use. Results showed that despite the simplified (a)synchronous sessions and joint construction, there were variations in how students wrote apologies, requests, invitations, and excuse letters. Most emails contained downtowners, and the politeness marker “po” was mostly used to soften impositions while “God bless” was utilized as a salutation. Although pragmalinguistic competence was observed, institutional power, rank, and distance were not much considered, which led to a vague sociopragmatic competence. This implies the need for explicit instructions about email politeness and the integration of pragmatics-based pedagogical interventions in teaching certain written content and formats.

Oral presentations are a great tool for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students, especially at a university in southern Vietnam. This study results from comparing the benefits and drawbacks of oral presentations from the vantage point of fifty final-year English majors. Ten participants had structured interviews using a mixed-methods approach combining data collection with a 27-item questionnaire. Results reveal that oral presentations significantly increase vocabulary learning (M = 4.42), grammatical understanding (M = 4.22), and creativity (M = 4.46) in preparation. Over presentations, students note higher confidence (M = 4.06), coherence (M = 4.06), and public speaking abilities (M = 4.32). Comments following presentations help to build critical thinking (M = 4.14) and quick reaction skills (M = 4.24). Still, there are problems with low vocabulary (M = 3.74), speaking anxiety (M = 4.00), and fluency concerns (M = 3.82). Notwithstanding these obstacles, oral presentations clearly improve speaking abilities and encourage student autonomy. Hence, their advantages exceed their disadvantages. Future training seminars should focus on psychological and language barriers to maximize the possible application of the method.

This study explores the role of reconstructing reflection in fostering critical thinking and enhancing English language skills among English as a foreign language (EFL) pre-service teacher in Indonesia. It investigates students' self-perceptions, strategies for language development, and real-world applications of English learning. A descriptive qualitative approach, supported by quantitative data, involved 55 pre-service elementary school teachers from a private Indonesian university. Data were collected through weekly open-closed questionnaires via Google Forms over one semester, encouraging reflections on learning processes, challenges, and improvement strategies. Quantitative findings revealed that 87.3% of students felt confident applying English writing and speaking skills. A Pearson correlation (r = .52, p < .05) showed a moderate relationship between self-confidence and post-test scores, highlighting the value of aligning perceived and actual proficiency. However, 23.5% of “Capable” students scored below the mean of 77.13, indicating a need for targeted feedback and formative assessments. Reflective practices played a key role in developing critical thinking, helping students address challenges, refine strategies, and relate learning to real-life situations. Themes such as technology use, collaborative learning, and media exposure emerged as effective tools. Despite positive outcomes, students faced limited confidence and restricted opportunities for practice. This study emphasizes reconstructing reflection as a structured, transformative process for improving learning outcomes. Aligned with the 4R reflection model, it addresses gaps in current practices—often marked by superficial reflection—and offers actionable strategies for promoting critical thinking in EFL settings. The findings support integrating reflection, feedback, and immersive learning to enhance teaching and education.

Feedback is a crucial element in writing instruction; however, its effectiveness is still debated among scholars. This study investigates the effectiveness of teacher and peer feedback in improving spelling and punctuation skills using a quantitative experimental design that involved two pre-intermediate writing classes at the International Maritime College Oman. Twenty-six participants were randomly selected from both classes. Students' spelling and punctuation errors were assessed using a pre-test–post-test design and data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS. Results indicated that teacher feedback significantly improved both spelling and punctuation, whereas peer feedback improved punctuation but led to a decline in spelling. Overall, teacher feedback outperformed peer feedback in enhancing writing accuracy. Due to the small sample size and focus on academic essays, findings may not be generalizable. Future research should explore additional writing genres and include larger, more diverse participant groups.

With increasing scholarly attention to the role of emotions in language learning, boredom, a prevalent yet often overlooked negative emotion in educational settings, has emerged as a significant research focus. Understanding boredom in language learning is crucial because it directly impacts students' motivation, engagement, and long-term achievement. Given that, this study investigates the level of English learning boredom (ELB) among Chinese high school students, examining potential differences across genders and grades. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research collected quantitative data through a questionnaire survey of 748 high school students in Northeast China, supplemented by qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews with 5 students. The findings revealed that students generally exhibited a low level of English learning boredom, meaning they rarely felt disinterested or bored in class. No statistically significant differences were observed between genders or across grade levels. Our interview results added further nuance to the quantitative findings.  Future research could expand the sample scope to include diverse geographical and socio-economic backgrounds and employ longitudinal approaches to track boredom dynamics over time. The study contributes to the growing body of literature on emotions in language learning and offers practical implications for educators seeking to reduce boredom and enhance student engagement in English classrooms.

Integrating critical thinking (CT) into English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction has become a pedagogical imperative in higher education, particularly in contexts striving to foster 21st-century competencies. While existing research has largely focused on intervention programs and theoretical models, there is a limited qualitative understanding of how EFL instructors embed CT within the actual teaching of language skills. This study investigates the pedagogical approaches employed by Indonesian university instructors to promote CT in reading, writing, listening, and speaking courses. Guided by the research question: What pedagogical approaches do Indonesian university EFL teachers use to promote CT in the teaching of the four language skills?, the study employed a qualitative research design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with eight EFL instructors (two per skill) from three private universities in Jakarta. Thematic analysis revealed four core themes: conceptualizing CT, skill-specific instructional strategies, challenges in implementation, and perceived student development. Findings indicate that while instructors share a strong commitment to CT, its integration is shaped by skill type, student proficiency, and institutional constraints. The study contributes novel qualitative insight into classroom-based CT pedagogy and offers practical implications for teacher education and curriculum design. Limitations include a small, urban-focused sample. Future research should consider broader, comparative contexts and incorporate student perspectives to deepen understanding and applicability.

This research explores the dependency on and patterns of artificial intelligence (AI) usage in English language learning among public university students in Bangladesh. The study aims to investigate the reasons behind students' reliance on AI tools, the types of information they seek, and the extent of their dependence. A mixed-method approach, combining both quantitative surveys and qualitative in-depth interviews, was employed to gather data from 120 students. The findings reveal that AI tools, particularly Grammarly and Duolingo, are widely used to improve academic writing, grammar, and vocabulary. Students perceive these tools as highly effective for language learning, as they provide instant feedback and make learning more accessible. However, the study also highlights significant concerns regarding the limitations of AI tools, such as their inability to grasp contextual understanding, cultural nuances, and the risk of over-reliance, which may hinder the development of critical thinking and metacognitive skills. Despite these concerns, students recognize the utility of AI tools as a complementary resource rather than a replacement for traditional learning methods. The research suggests that AI tools should be integrated into language learning in a balanced manner, with attention to equity in access and the development of students' higher-order thinking skills. It also emphasizes the need for policy interventions to address the digital divide and ensure that all students, particularly in resource-limited environments, have equitable access to these transformative tools.

CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) incorporates content acquisition and language instruction, allowing students to develop linguistic competencies while engaging with particular topics. This research aims to investigate the effectiveness of CLIL activities in enhancing students' vocabulary, as well as to explore students’ views of engaging in CLIL activities for their learning process. The participants consisted of 21 primary school students with diverse levels of English ability. The study employed a mixed-methods research approach, combining a quasi-experimental study (one-group pre-test and post-test) with a survey. The results indicated that CLIL activities notably improved students’ vocabulary mastery, with post-test scores (Mean: 60,38) surpassing the average pre-test scores (Mean: 58,28). In response to the students' perceptions of their experiences, among 21 students, 15 (71%) indicated that CLIL activities enhanced their interest in English and science. In this study, CLIL activities were carried out by incorporating singing, engaging in games such as flashcards and QNA, and facilitating group discussions. The CLIL activities offer significant contexts for language application, facilitating the effective acquisition of new vocabulary for students. The students demonstrated enhanced vocabulary test scores as a result of the learning activities. The findings indicate that CLIL-based learning significantly enhances students’ vocabulary, and students express a favourable perception of this approach. Educators should incorporate CLIL activities into their instructional methods to create a vibrant and engaging learning environment. Future investigations could delve into the implementation of CLIL across various educational settings and disciplines to fully harness its potential advantages.