Aikawa, H., Fukasawa, E., & Hemmi, C. (2021). The role of the essential question in eliciting critical thinking in CLIL classes at a Japanese university. In C. Hemmi, & D. L. Banegas (Eds.), International Perspectives on CLIL (pp. 107-127). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70095-9_6

Al Hajri, M., Al Mekhlafi, A., & Al Barwani, T. (2021). Connecting the dots: Impact of CLIL on vocabulary size and content mastery in higher education. Multicultural Education, 7(9), 411-431. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5527158

Almelhes, S. (2024). Enhancing Arabic language acquisition: Effective strategies for addressing non-native learners’ challenges. Education Sciences, 14(10), Article 1116. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101116

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. K. (2009). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Cangage Learning. https://books.google.com.tr/books/about/Introduction_to_Research_in_Education.html?id=FqF7n0zGJm0C&redir_esc=y

Azpilicueta-Martínez, R., & Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. (2023). Intensity of CLIL exposure and L2 motivation in primary school: Evidence from Spanish EFL learners in non-CLIL, low-CLIL and high-CLIL programmes. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 63(2), 893-914. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0239

Banegas, D. L., Montgomery, D. P., & Raud, N. (2025). Student-teachers’ understanding of language teaching through the CLIL Language Triptych. Learning and Instruction, 95, Article 102044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102044

Baten, K., Van Hiel, S., & De Cuypere, L. (2020). Vocabulary development in a CLIL context: A comparison between French and English L2. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 307-336.  

Baten, R. A., Bagley, D., Tenesaca, A., Clark, F., Bagrow, J. P., Ghoshal, G., & Hoque, E. (2020). Creativity in temporal social networks: How divergent thinking is impacted by one’s choice of peers. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 17(171), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2020.0667

Bower, K. (2020). School leaders’ perspectives on content and language integrated learning in England. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 33(4), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2019.1667367

Bower, K., Cross, R., & Coyle, D. (2020). CLIL in multilingual and English-background contexts. In K. Bower, D. Coyle, R. Cross, & G. N. Chambers (Eds.), Curriculum integrated language teaching (pp. 3-21). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108687867.003

Cahyati, P., & Madya, S. (2019). Teaching English in primary schools: Benefits and challenges. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2018) (pp. 395-400). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccie-18.2019.68

Chang, Y.-L. (2025). Beyond common sense: An inquiry into Neoliberalism and English as the medium of instruction in Taiwanese higher education. Higher Education Policy. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-025-00398-z 

Cimermanová, I. (2020). Meta-analysis of studies on the acquisition of receptive skills and vocabulary in CLIL. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 8(1), 30-52. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2020-0003

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549 

Coyle, Y., & Roca de Larios, J. (2020). Exploring young learners’ engagement with models as a written corrective technique in EFL and CLIL settings. System, 95, Article 102374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102374

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Cupchik, G. (2001). Constructivist realism: An ontology that encompasses positivist and constructivist approaches to the social sciences. Forum: Qualitative Sozial Forschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.968

Dalton-Puffer, C., Hüttner, J., & Llinares, A. (2022). CLIL in the 21st century: Retrospective and prospective challenges and opportunities. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 10(2), 182-206. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21021.dal

Darvin, R., Lo, Y. Y., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2020). Examining CLIL through a critical lens. English Teaching and Learning, 44, 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-020-00062-2

Dourda, K., Bratitsis, T., Griva, E., & Papadopoulou, P. (2014). Content and language integrated learning through an online game in primary school: A case study. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 12(3), 243-258. http://bit.ly/4nCgTzv  

Fitrawati, F., Syarif, H., Zaim, M., & Perrodin, D. D. (2023). The perceptions of tertiary students and lecturers regarding CLIL-based critical reading material employing interactive multimedia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 612-625. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i3.36838

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed). McGraw-Hill Education.  

Ginting, D. (2021). Student engagement and factors affecting active learning in English language teaching. VELES Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v5i2.3968

Goris, J. A., Denessen, E. J. P. G., & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2019). Effects of content and language integrated learning in Europe A systematic review of longitudinal experimental studies. European Educational Research Journal, 18(6), 675-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119872426

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2013). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269

Hao, T., Wang, Z., & Ardasheva, Y. (2021). Technology-assisted vocabulary learning for EFL learners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 14(3), 645-667. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2021.1917028

Hemmi, C., & Banegas, D. L. (2021). CLIL: An overview. In C. Hemmi, & D. L. Banegas (Eds.), International perspectives on CLIL (pp. 1-20). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70095-9_1

Huang, F., Ge, X., Li, Y., & Tang, Z. (2025). Unveiling unwillingness to communicate among EFL learners in flipped learning: An ecological perspective. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2025.2458638

Huang, Y.-C. (2020). The effects of elementary students’ science learning in CLIL. English Language Teaching, 13(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n2p1

Husna, N., Rachmayani, A., Maulidya, R. A., & Fahriany, F. (2025). The importance of English subjects at the primary level: Stakeholders’ perceptions. Studies in English Language and Education, 12(1), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.36642

Idris, N. (2010). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan [Research in education]. McGraw Hill Education.   

Islam, M. S., & Stapa, M. B. (2021). Students’ low proficiency in spoken English in private universities in Bangladesh: Reasons and remedies. Language Testing in Asia, 11, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00139-0

Ismail, S. A. A., & Al Allaq, K. (2019). The nature of cooperative learning and differentiated instruction practices in English classes. Sage Open, 9(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019856450

Ismailov, M., Chiu, T. K., Aizawa, I., Yamamoto, Y., Djalilova, N., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2025). Essential lecturer competencies in English medium instruction: A study across student proficiency levels. RELC Journal. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882241312427

Jafarigohar, M., Divsar, H., & Etemad, P. (2022). The effect of CLIL context on the primary education EFL receptive and productive lexical growth. Language Teaching Research, 29(3), 1114-1138. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221078997

Jäppinen, A.-K. (2005). Thinking and content learning of mathematics and science as cognitional development in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Teaching through a foreign language in Finland. Language and Education, 19(2), 147-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780508668671

Kalay, D. (2021). Receptive vocabulary knowledge of university students in CLIL instruction. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(3), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v5i3.3527

Kreijkes, P., & Greatorex, J. (2024). Differential effects of subject‐based and integrated curriculum approaches on students’ learning outcomes: A review of reviews. Review of Education, 12(1), Article e3465. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3465

Lai, C.-J. (2024). The effects of hands-on content-language integrated learning on fourth graders’ acquisition of target vocabulary and procedural knowledge in Taiwan. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 1397. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03960-z

Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2010). Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal, 64(4), 367-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp082

Lizarte Simón, E. J., Gijón Puerta, J., Galván Malagón, M. C., & Khaled Gijón, M. (2024). Influence of self-efficacy, anxiety and psychological well-being on academic engagement during university education. Education Sciences, 14(12), Article 1367. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121367

Ma’rifat, D. (2017). A case study of using songs in teaching English vocabulary to young learners. Journal of English and Education, 5(1), 49-55. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/L-E/article/view/9902/6316 

Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2019). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (12th ed.). Pearson.  

Mirzayev, A. B., & Oripova, S. Z. (2022). Коммуникативный метод – новый подход в практике обучения иностранному языку [Communicative method-a new approach in the practice of teaching foreign language]. Science and Innovation International Scientific Journal, 1(6), 778-783. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7191438

Navarro-Pablo, M., & López Gándara, Y. (2020). The effects of CLIL on L1 competence development in monolingual contexts. The Language Learning Journal, 48(1), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1656764

Nguyen, L. T., Kanjug, I., Lowatcharin, G., Manakul, T., Poonpon, K., Sarakorn, W., Somabut, A., Srisawasdi, N., Traiyarach, S., & Tuamsuk, K. (2022). How teachers manage their classroom in the digital learning environment – experiences from the University Smart Learning Project. Heliyon, 8(10), Article ee10817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10817

Novitskaya, Y., Gordon, R. R., Hartman, D. K., & Green-Eneix, C. (2025). Curators and mediators of language, content, pedagogy, and technology: Teachers’ expanding roles in fully-online CLIL contexts. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 48(1), 50-69. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2025-0104

Olsson, E., & Sylvén, L. (2015). Extramural English and academic vocabulary A longitudinal study of CLIL and non-CLIL students in Sweden. Apples: Journal of Applied Language Studies, 9(2), 77-103. https://doi.org/10.17011/apples/urn.201512234129

Pavia, N., Webb, S., & Faez, F. (2019). Incidental vocabulary learning through listening to songs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(4), 745-768. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000020

Permana, I. G. Y. (2020). Teaching vocabulary for elementary school students. The Art of Teaching English as a Foreign Language, 1(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.36663/tatefl.v1i2.56

Pipit, M. (2018). CLIL as an alternative approach for designing English course syllabus in Indonesia. Asian ESP Journal, 14(4).  

Reynaert, D., Dijkstra, P., Knevel, J., Hartman, J., Tirions, M., Geraghty, C., Gradener, J., Lochtenberg, M., & van den Hoven, R. (2019). Human rights at the heart of the social work curriculum. Social Work Education, 38(1), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2018.1554033

Ruegg, R., Hoang, H., & Petersen, N. (2024). The influence of English language proficiency test scores on the academic success of ESL undergraduate students. Educational Research and Evaluation, 29(3-4), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2024.2314533

Sepyanda, M. (2017). The importance of English subjcet in elementary school curriculum. English Language Teaching and Research Conference, 1(1). http://bit.ly/4pLfisu   

Shi, Y.-s., & Tsai, C.-y. (2024). Fostering vocabulary learning: Mind mapping app enhances performances of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 634-686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2052905

Sukmawati, I. D., & Pujiani, T. (2024). English as Medium of Instruction (EMI) at primary schools in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities. The Journal of English Teaching for Young and Adult Learners, 3(1), 14-20.  

Tagnin, L., & Ní Ríordáin, M. (2021). Building science through questions in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00293-0

Taherdoost, H. (2022). what are different research approaches? comprehensive review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations. Journal of Management Science and Engineering Research, 5(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538

Tai, K. W. H., & Wei, L. (2024). Mobilising multilingual and multimodal resources for facilitating knowledge construction: Implications for researching translanguaging and multimodality in CLIL classroom context. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(5), 1531-1541. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2442525

Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD. http://bit.ly/4o8adcm

Uysal, H. H., & Bardakci, M. (2014). Teacher beliefs and practices of grammar teaching: Focusing on meaning, form, or forms? South African Journal of Education, 34(1), Article 882. https://doi.org/10.15700/201412120943

Vraciu, A., & Marsol, A. (2023). Content-specific vocabulary in CLIL: Exploring L2 learning outcomes in a primary education programme in Catalonia. Language Teaching Research. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231170073

Zhang, Y., & Wang, H. (2023). Effect of English learning motivation on academic performance among English majors in China: The moderating role of certain personality traits. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 2187-2199. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S407486