logo logo European Journal of English Language Studies

EJELS is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

RHAPSODE
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
College House, 2nd Floor 17 King Edwards Road, Ruislip, London, HA4 7AE, UK
RHAPSODE
Headquarters
College House, 2nd Floor 17 King Edwards Road, Ruislip, London, HA4 7AE, UK
Research Article

The Issue of Learning Culture as a Hindrance in Promoting Learner Autonomy

Nuray Okumus Ceylan

The patriarchal structure in Turkish society along with teacher-centered instructional style cause Turkish learners to become passive and dependent le.


  • Pub. date: June 15, 2025
  • Pages: 129-138
  • 30 Downloads
  • 114 Views
  • 0 Citations

How to Cite

Abstract:

T

The patriarchal structure in Turkish society along with teacher-centered instructional style cause Turkish learners to become passive and dependent learners. Teacher is accepted as an authority figure in the classroom, who should take most of the responsibilities and make most of the decisions about their learning in the classroom context. Also, teaching English is regarded as a subject to be taught, but not a language of communication. These characteristics of Turkish learning culture are considered as factors that hinder students in the continuum of independent or autonomous learning. This study aimed to figure out the learning realities of learners and the specific conditions affecting the development of learner autonomy into consideration to identify students’ readiness for autonomous study. The analysis of the learner autonomy questionnaire results indicated that participants had weak control over their own learning process indicating low level of autonomy. Moreover, they do not feel very competent in making decisions about their own learning in formal classroom environment.

Keywords: Learner autonomy, learning culture, independent study.

description PDF
file_save XML
Article Metrics
Views
30
Download
114
Citations
Crossref
0

References

Afshan, A., Askari, I., & Manickam, L. S. (2015). Shyness, self-construal, extraversion–introversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism: A cross-cultural comparison among college students. SAGE Open, 5(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/açık erişim linki var mı10.1177/2158244015587559

Amroun, F. P. (2008). Learner autonomy and intercultural competence [Master’s thesis, University of Westminster]. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15201.51047

Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (n.d.). Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. British Council, Teaching English. http://bit.ly/3HO9AVu

Chan, V., Spratt, M., & Humphreys, G. (2002). Autonomous language learning: Hong Kong tertiary students’ attitudes and behaviours. Evaluation & Research in Education, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790208667003

Cotterall, S. (1995). Developing a course strategy for learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 49(3), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.3.219

Gieve, S., & Clark, R. (2005). ‘The Chinese approach to learning’: Cultural trait or situated response? The case of self-directed learning programme. System, 33(2), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.09.015

Hatipoğlu Kavanoz, S. (2006). An exploratory study of English language teachers' beliefs, assumptions, and knowledge about learner-centeredness. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 3–9. https://www.tojet.net/articles/v5i2/521.pdf

Haznedar, B. (2010). Türkiye’de yabancı dil eğitimi: Reformlar, yönelimler ve öğretmenlerimiz [Foreign language education in Turkey: Reforms, trends and our teachers]. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (pp.747–755). ICONTE

Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90015-5

Holec, H. (1985). On autonomy: Some elementary concepts. In P. Riley (Ed.), Discourse and learning (pp. 173–190). Longman.

Huang, J. (2006). Fostering learner autonomy within constraints: Negotiation and mediation in an atmosphere of collegiality. Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 21(3), 38–57.

Karabiyik, C. (2008). Development and validation of the foreign language learning effort scale for Turkish tertiary-level students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice/Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 18(2), 373-395.

Li, D. (1998). "It's always more difficult than you plan and imagine": Teachers' perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 677–703. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588000

Littlewood, W. (1996). “Autonomy”: An anatomy and a framework. System, 24(4), 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00039-5

Nakata, Y. (2011). Teachers’ readiness for promoting learner autonomy: A study of Japanese EFL high school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 900–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.03.001

Nasri, N., Eslami Rasekh, A., Vahid Dastjerdy, H., & Amirian, Z. (2015). Promoting learner autonomy in an Iranian EFL high school context: Teachers’ practices and constraints in focus. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 4(3), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2015.925

Nguyen, T. N. (2014). Learner autonomy in language learning: Teachers’ beliefs [Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology]. QUT ePrints. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/69937/

Okumuş Ceylan, N. (2015). Fostering learner autonomy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.491

Pierson, P. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48(2), 143–179. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1996.0004

Reinders, H., & Lazaro, N. (2011). Beliefs, identity and motivation in implementing autonomy: The teachers’ perspective. In G. Murray, X. Gao & T. Lamb (Eds.), Identity, motivation, and autonomy in language learning (pp. 125-142). Multilingual Matters.

Shebani, Z., & Pulvermüller, F. (2018). Flexibility in language action interaction: The influence of movement type. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, Article 252. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00252

Tudor, I. (1997). Learner-centredness as language education. Cambridge University Press.

Yasmin, M., & Sohail, A. (2018). A creative alliance between learner autonomy and English language learning: Pakistani university teachers’ beliefs. Creativity Studies, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3846/23450479.2017.1406874

Yılmaz, M. (2007). Sınıf öğretmeni yetiştirmede teknoloji eğitimi [Instructional technology in training primary school teacher]. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1), 155–167. http://bit.ly/4lhF3Od

Yumuk, A. Ş. (2002). Letting go of control to the learners: The role of the internet in promoting a more autonomous view of learning in an academic translation course. Educational Research, 44(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880210135278

...