Skinner’s behaviorist theory delineates how a child acquires L1; notwithstanding, what sets the present study apart from Skinner’s findings can be culled-out from the research context itself. This paper validates the principles behind behaviorist theory as proposed by Skinner (1985) taking into account applied linguistics context. Careful scrutiny of data reveals that the explored theory also plays a vital role in the gradual L2 acquisition through meaningful linguistic attempts (e.g., There are persons cutting trees without replanting; His friends Marilyn and Alicia clean the classroom) and reading activities by fostering affirmative learning atmosphere to induce positive language attitude towards L2 acquisition and functionality. Negligible errors in the process of L2 acquisition are attributed to linguistic variability, interlanguage, and inflectional morphology component. This study is advantageous to EFL learners and teachers globally for it highlights some linguistic implications indispensable to interpret the learning rate, lexical range, comprehensible input (CI), and language cognition of L2 students specifically in early language education. EFL educators may be able to provide meaningful linguistic activities by considering the essential tenets of this academic piece as well as the multiculturalism factor to L2 acquisition.

Integrating critical thinking (CT) into English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction has become a pedagogical imperative in higher education, particularly in contexts striving to foster 21st-century competencies. While existing research has largely focused on intervention programs and theoretical models, there is a limited qualitative understanding of how EFL instructors embed CT within the actual teaching of language skills. This study investigates the pedagogical approaches employed by Indonesian university instructors to promote CT in reading, writing, listening, and speaking courses. Guided by the research question: What pedagogical approaches do Indonesian university EFL teachers use to promote CT in the teaching of the four language skills?, the study employed a qualitative research design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with eight EFL instructors (two per skill) from three private universities in Jakarta. Thematic analysis revealed four core themes: conceptualizing CT, skill-specific instructional strategies, challenges in implementation, and perceived student development. Findings indicate that while instructors share a strong commitment to CT, its integration is shaped by skill type, student proficiency, and institutional constraints. The study contributes novel qualitative insight into classroom-based CT pedagogy and offers practical implications for teacher education and curriculum design. Limitations include a small, urban-focused sample. Future research should consider broader, comparative contexts and incorporate student perspectives to deepen understanding and applicability.

This research explores the dependency on and patterns of artificial intelligence (AI) usage in English language learning among public university students in Bangladesh. The study aims to investigate the reasons behind students' reliance on AI tools, the types of information they seek, and the extent of their dependence. A mixed-method approach, combining both quantitative surveys and qualitative in-depth interviews, was employed to gather data from 120 students. The findings reveal that AI tools, particularly Grammarly and Duolingo, are widely used to improve academic writing, grammar, and vocabulary. Students perceive these tools as highly effective for language learning, as they provide instant feedback and make learning more accessible. However, the study also highlights significant concerns regarding the limitations of AI tools, such as their inability to grasp contextual understanding, cultural nuances, and the risk of over-reliance, which may hinder the development of critical thinking and metacognitive skills. Despite these concerns, students recognize the utility of AI tools as a complementary resource rather than a replacement for traditional learning methods. The research suggests that AI tools should be integrated into language learning in a balanced manner, with attention to equity in access and the development of students' higher-order thinking skills. It also emphasizes the need for policy interventions to address the digital divide and ensure that all students, particularly in resource-limited environments, have equitable access to these transformative tools.