This study investigates the benefits of formulating research teams within the context of Vietnam, focusing particularly on researchers specializing in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL), English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teaching and learning, French as a Foreign Language (FFL) teaching and learning, and Language and Linguistics. Through semi-structured interviews with 12 researchers of varied experiences, Grounded Theory and thematic analysis were utilized to unravel key benefits. The findings reveal that team-based  research offers advantages including enhanced knowledge sharing, skills diversification, improved decision-making, expanded research scope, access to greater resources, increased accountability, opportunities for leadership and teamwork skills, and more. The study underlines the immense potential of collaborative research in the Vietnamese context. The conclusions drawn emphasize the necessity for institutions to encourage and facilitate team-based research practices, offering important insights for policy formulation. While providing nuanced understanding of the Vietnamese research context, the study acknowledges limitations, including its narrow disciplinary focus and reliance on participant interviews. Recommendations for future research include exploring challenges within research teams, conducting cross-cultural and interdisciplinary studies, examining the impact of technology and leadership styles on team dynamics, and exploring the role of institutional support.

Bangladeshi migrant workers make up a large part of the Gulf labor force, yet face significant English language barriers affecting workplace safety and economic outcomes. This systematic review synthesizes existing evidence on English language learning motivation, barriers, and workplace communication needs among this population in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched academic databases and gray literature (2010-2024), using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the AACODS checklist for quality assessment. Narrative synthesis used the Self-Determination Theory and Workplace Learning Theory frameworks. From 892 initial records, 35 studies were included (18 peer-reviewed articles, 9 government reports, 8 organizational studies). Economic survival emerged as the primary motivation, with 52% of workers identifying language barriers as significant obstacles to workplace success and economic advancement. Systematic barriers included time limits of 10-12 hours per workday, financial difficulties, and inadequate pre-departure training, which consisted of only three days of language instruction. Safety-critical communication dominated across sectors, with construction workers requiring hazard vocabulary and service employees needing customer interaction skills. Evidence-based educational interventions should focus on sector-specific survival English programs, mobile learning solutions addressing documented time limits, and employer incentive systems to support systematic language development. Enhanced pre-departure training and bilateral labor agreements that incorporate comprehensive language provisions are essential for improving worker outcomes and enhancing workplace safety.