Failure in visual word recognition brings about frustration and failure in reading which impinge on the achievement and reading progress of learners. In order to contribute towards assisting every child to achieve minimum proficiency in reading, this investigation examined the impact of podcasts on the abilities of second language learners in sight word recognition. The study which is quasi-experimental, made use of the pre-test post-test nonequivalent groups method. The study participants who were purposively sampled from a privately owned primary school in Enugu urban, South East, Nigeria comprise thirty elementary two learners. Pre-and post-tests were administered to the participants who were grouped into intervention and control groups. The intervention group listened to podcasts in word recognition skills while the control group learned word recognition through the usual method. Statistical tools such as means, standard deviation and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were utilized to analyze the data collected. The research question was answered through Standard Deviation and the learners’ mean achievement scores, while the hypothesis, which was set at <0.05 level of significance, was tested with the ANCOVA. The results of the investigation showed that podcasts facilitated improvement in the word recognition skills of English as a second language (ESL) learners. The study concluded that the use of podcast proves to be an efficient instructional media capable of promoting achievement in word recognition skills of learners in an ESL classroom. On the basis of the results, exploring the use of podcasts in the teaching of word recognition skills among ESL learners was recommended.

This qualitative study explored: (a) How do the three English-Education-major (EE hereafter) undergraduates perceive their academic self-efficacy change experiences over the first two years after major transfer? (b) What are the personal and social factors that prompt their academic self-efficacy change? Data was collected from three EE students at S University in S city, China. Data sources include semi-structured interviews, reflections, and observation notes. Data analysis uses qualitative content analysis, adopting an inductive approach to allow themes to naturally emerge from the data. Findings reveal that participants experienced academic self-efficacy changes through continuous and uneasy processes. Significant changes were noted in the participants’ academic self-efficacy. Key personal factors, including mastery experiences and physiological/emotional states, along with social factors, including verbal and social persuasion and vicarious experiences, were found to substantially influence self-efficacy. In light of the above findings, practical implications were proposed for EE programs and program developers from the three aspects: creating opportunities for mastery experiences within EE programs, incorporating elements of social persuasion and vicarious learning, and integrating modules focused on managing anxiety and fostering resilience. Limitations of this study and recommendations for future research were discussed.

This two-year action research study examines how incorporating ‘The Writing Revolution’ (TWR) strategies and adapting task complexity can improve TESOL students' expository writing in secondary education in Cyprus. A total of eighty-three students (12-17 years old) from various first language (L1) backgrounds and CEFR levels (A1-B2) participated from six lower secondary (LS) and upper secondary (US) state classrooms. The methodology involved spending one-quarter of students' weekly class time on the learning and application of TWR techniques in their L2/EFL writing. Overall, 90-180 activities were completed successfully, and cognitively undemanding and context-embedded writing tasks gave way to more complex and cognitively demanding tasks to suit students’ differing proficiency levels. Qualitative analysis of students’ writing and focus group discussions indicated that writing improved coherence, organization, and complexity. Students expressed feelings of reduced anxiety and improved confidence in English writing. These findings highlight the importance of dedicating time to teaching writing explicitly in L2/FL classrooms and gradually increasing task complexity beginning at the sentence level. This study’s unique contribution demonstrates how TWR strategies can be effectively tailored to L2/FL contexts and offer practical implications for TESOL curriculum developers, researchers, and educators seeking to improve students’ writing confidence in FL and lessen writing anxiety in the classroom.

Oral presentations are a great tool for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students, especially at a university in southern Vietnam. This study results from comparing the benefits and drawbacks of oral presentations from the vantage point of fifty final-year English majors. Ten participants had structured interviews using a mixed-methods approach combining data collection with a 27-item questionnaire. Results reveal that oral presentations significantly increase vocabulary learning (M = 4.42), grammatical understanding (M = 4.22), and creativity (M = 4.46) in preparation. Over presentations, students note higher confidence (M = 4.06), coherence (M = 4.06), and public speaking abilities (M = 4.32). Comments following presentations help to build critical thinking (M = 4.14) and quick reaction skills (M = 4.24). Still, there are problems with low vocabulary (M = 3.74), speaking anxiety (M = 4.00), and fluency concerns (M = 3.82). Notwithstanding these obstacles, oral presentations clearly improve speaking abilities and encourage student autonomy. Hence, their advantages exceed their disadvantages. Future training seminars should focus on psychological and language barriers to maximize the possible application of the method.

This study explores the role of reconstructing reflection in fostering critical thinking and enhancing English language skills among English as a foreign language (EFL) pre-service teacher in Indonesia. It investigates students' self-perceptions, strategies for language development, and real-world applications of English learning. A descriptive qualitative approach, supported by quantitative data, involved 55 pre-service elementary school teachers from a private Indonesian university. Data were collected through weekly open-closed questionnaires via Google Forms over one semester, encouraging reflections on learning processes, challenges, and improvement strategies. Quantitative findings revealed that 87.3% of students felt confident applying English writing and speaking skills. A Pearson correlation (r = .52, p < .05) showed a moderate relationship between self-confidence and post-test scores, highlighting the value of aligning perceived and actual proficiency. However, 23.5% of “Capable” students scored below the mean of 77.13, indicating a need for targeted feedback and formative assessments. Reflective practices played a key role in developing critical thinking, helping students address challenges, refine strategies, and relate learning to real-life situations. Themes such as technology use, collaborative learning, and media exposure emerged as effective tools. Despite positive outcomes, students faced limited confidence and restricted opportunities for practice. This study emphasizes reconstructing reflection as a structured, transformative process for improving learning outcomes. Aligned with the 4R reflection model, it addresses gaps in current practices—often marked by superficial reflection—and offers actionable strategies for promoting critical thinking in EFL settings. The findings support integrating reflection, feedback, and immersive learning to enhance teaching and education.

Feedback is a crucial element in writing instruction; however, its effectiveness is still debated among scholars. This study investigates the effectiveness of teacher and peer feedback in improving spelling and punctuation skills using a quantitative experimental design that involved two pre-intermediate writing classes at the International Maritime College Oman. Twenty-six participants were randomly selected from both classes. Students' spelling and punctuation errors were assessed using a pre-test–post-test design and data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS. Results indicated that teacher feedback significantly improved both spelling and punctuation, whereas peer feedback improved punctuation but led to a decline in spelling. Overall, teacher feedback outperformed peer feedback in enhancing writing accuracy. Due to the small sample size and focus on academic essays, findings may not be generalizable. Future research should explore additional writing genres and include larger, more diverse participant groups.

Motivation is one of the most critical prerequisites contributing to English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students’ academic success. Nonetheless, the connection between students’ motivation and academic low achievement remains underexplored in Vietnam. This study, therefore, drawing from Deci and Ryan’s Self-determination Theory, endeavored to bridge this gap by exploring factors affecting low-achieving high school EFL students’ motivation in learning English, which in turn shaped their academic outcomes. The study adopted a cross-sectional qualitative case study design and conducted semi-structured interviews with four purposefully selected participants. Qualitative data were analyzed via convergent cross-case thematic analysis. Findings revealed that participants’ motivation in learning English was dramatically affected by external and internal factors. External factors included institution-related, family-related, teacher-related, peer-related, and socioculture-related influences. Internal factors encompassed intrinsic motivation in learning English, personal interests in learning English, and self-regulated learning competence. Critically, external factors were perceived to be more influential on their motivation in learning English than internal factors. Subsequently, some pedagogical implications were introduced to relevant stakeholders to enhance teaching practices and foster English learning motivation among this student population.

With increasing scholarly attention to the role of emotions in language learning, boredom, a prevalent yet often overlooked negative emotion in educational settings, has emerged as a significant research focus. Understanding boredom in language learning is crucial because it directly impacts students' motivation, engagement, and long-term achievement. Given that, this study investigates the level of English learning boredom (ELB) among Chinese high school students, examining potential differences across genders and grades. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research collected quantitative data through a questionnaire survey of 748 high school students in Northeast China, supplemented by qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews with 5 students. The findings revealed that students generally exhibited a low level of English learning boredom, meaning they rarely felt disinterested or bored in class. No statistically significant differences were observed between genders or across grade levels. Our interview results added further nuance to the quantitative findings.  Future research could expand the sample scope to include diverse geographical and socio-economic backgrounds and employ longitudinal approaches to track boredom dynamics over time. The study contributes to the growing body of literature on emotions in language learning and offers practical implications for educators seeking to reduce boredom and enhance student engagement in English classrooms.

Integrating critical thinking (CT) into English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction has become a pedagogical imperative in higher education, particularly in contexts striving to foster 21st-century competencies. While existing research has largely focused on intervention programs and theoretical models, there is a limited qualitative understanding of how EFL instructors embed CT within the actual teaching of language skills. This study investigates the pedagogical approaches employed by Indonesian university instructors to promote CT in reading, writing, listening, and speaking courses. Guided by the research question: What pedagogical approaches do Indonesian university EFL teachers use to promote CT in the teaching of the four language skills?, the study employed a qualitative research design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with eight EFL instructors (two per skill) from three private universities in Jakarta. Thematic analysis revealed four core themes: conceptualizing CT, skill-specific instructional strategies, challenges in implementation, and perceived student development. Findings indicate that while instructors share a strong commitment to CT, its integration is shaped by skill type, student proficiency, and institutional constraints. The study contributes novel qualitative insight into classroom-based CT pedagogy and offers practical implications for teacher education and curriculum design. Limitations include a small, urban-focused sample. Future research should consider broader, comparative contexts and incorporate student perspectives to deepen understanding and applicability.

This research explores the dependency on and patterns of artificial intelligence (AI) usage in English language learning among public university students in Bangladesh. The study aims to investigate the reasons behind students' reliance on AI tools, the types of information they seek, and the extent of their dependence. A mixed-method approach, combining both quantitative surveys and qualitative in-depth interviews, was employed to gather data from 120 students. The findings reveal that AI tools, particularly Grammarly and Duolingo, are widely used to improve academic writing, grammar, and vocabulary. Students perceive these tools as highly effective for language learning, as they provide instant feedback and make learning more accessible. However, the study also highlights significant concerns regarding the limitations of AI tools, such as their inability to grasp contextual understanding, cultural nuances, and the risk of over-reliance, which may hinder the development of critical thinking and metacognitive skills. Despite these concerns, students recognize the utility of AI tools as a complementary resource rather than a replacement for traditional learning methods. The research suggests that AI tools should be integrated into language learning in a balanced manner, with attention to equity in access and the development of students' higher-order thinking skills. It also emphasizes the need for policy interventions to address the digital divide and ensure that all students, particularly in resource-limited environments, have equitable access to these transformative tools.